Third International Colloquium 2002
Letter of invitation The questions The participants
Minutes | Protokoll (Powerpoint Presentation)
Presentation Peter F. Schmid: What is essential? Person-centered and Experiential Psychotherapy
As a sequel to the colloquia in Bad Hall 1996 and Kranichberg 1999 the Third International Colloquium of the Person-Centered Association in Austria will be held immediately after the 3rd World Conference for Psychotherapy (July 14-18, 2002) in Vienna.
Time
July 19 (11 a.m.) – 21 (5 p.m.), 2002
Location
Vienna, Austria
Subject
What is essential?
Person-centered and experiential psychotherapy –
perspectives and prospects
This time — in the year of his 100th anniversary — we will have a profound discussion about the diverse orientations which rely on Carl Rogers, about their commonalities and differences. Thus we invite distinguished professionals in theory and practice of the person-centred and experiential approaches from all over the world to join a stimulating exchange about the identity of person-centered and experiential therapy and counselling. Which are considered to be the core concepts? What are the fundamental aspects of identity and identification? What are the essential differentiations within the orientations and towards other approaches?
Beyond
the professional meeting we are looking forward to enriching personal encounters.
As before every participant takes care for his own costs, we, the Austrians,
will do our best to care for the organisation and the atmosphere.
In order to have enough time and space for the exchange the group of
participants will be kept small.
Robert Bauer, Christian Fehringer, Peter Frenzel, Winfried Janisch, Lore Korbei, Christian Korunka, Peter F. Schmid, Hermann Spielhofer, Marietta Winkler, Elisabeth Zinschitz
copy
The questions: What is essential?
What are the
specifics
of your understanding of the
approach?
In which respect is this
understanding based on or
rooted in Carl Rogers‘s
theory and practice?
Which
criteria
to distinguish what is person-centered or not are
inherent to this understanding?
How did you
personally
come to this particular understanding?
Which
term
would you use
to characterize
your specific understanding of the approach?
Robert Bauer, A
Ute Binder, D
Christian Fehringer, A
Jobst Finke, D
Charlotte Gröflin-Buitink, CH
Mary Hendricks Gendlin, USA
Lore Korbei, A
Germain Lietaer, B
Peter F. Schmid, A
Hermann Spielhofer, A
Margaret Warner, USA
Marietta Winkler, A
Elisabeth Zinschitz, A
Protokoll des Verlaufs | Minutes (Powerpoint Presentation)
Div. Tagungen zu 100 Jahre
Carl Rogers | Carl Rogers Anniversary - conferences worldwide
PCA-Titelseite | PCA Mainpage
Zur Hauptseite | Mainpage Peter F. Schmid 
Zum
Seitenanfang | Top of page